Diese Seite verwendet Cookies. Wenn Sie das nicht akzeptieren, mĂĽssen Sie Cookies in Ihrem Browser verbieten oder diese Seite verlassen.    OK  
 Meine Leselupe

Mitglieder:   5294
Themen:   88054
Momentan online:
35 Gäste und 1 Mitglieder
Passwort vergessen?

Leselupe.de > Fremdsprachiges und MundART
A New Berlin Wall?
Eingestellt am 04. 01. 2006 05:08

Ein neues Thema veröffentlichen.     Antwort veröffentlichen.
Manchmal gelesener Autor
Registriert: Jul 2004

Werke: 197
Kommentare: 1253
Die besten Werke
Email senden
Hier klicken, um MDSpinoza eine Online-Nachricht zu senden  Online-Nachricht

A New Berlin Wall?

Fifty-one days have passed since the election of Angela Merkel as the first German chancellorette. Usually, a newly elected political leader will be granted a grace period of one hundred days to get things started his/her way before evaluation. Half of that period has expired, but it is clearly to be seen that nothing new is going to happen in Germany.
After having fired the only helper who had possessed something like competence well before her election, a professor of economy, not linked to any party, Angie is surrounded by the usual suspects, mostly career politicians.
The discarded professor had warned her about the risks of a raised VAT (Valor Added Tax a.k.a. sales tax), but it seems his warnings were futile.
Angie’s announcing a VAT raise was, besides the personal issue between Oskar Lafontaine and Gerd Schröder, one of the major reasons for the resulting stale mate situation in the German Bundestag.
Weird, weird world: once in a while, a politician’s electoral campaign promise comes true: She is, defying all warning voices, going to raise the VAT not only by two points but three, from 16% now to 19% from Jan. 1st 2007 on. To worsen things more, the income tax for higher incomes will be raised from 43% to 45% as well. This so-called “Reichensteuer” (Tax for the rich) will affect not only income but assets as well.
So much for the start, these “features” were the main parts of the coalition negotiations with her coalition partner, The Social Democratic Party (SPD).
Meanwhile, after a few international handshakes and some legislation activities, the outline of her political concept begins to emerge from the electoral campaign fog:
To buy a truce in the eternal EU dispute with the British, she promised Mr. Tony Blair (Labour), PM of the UK, two billion €uros out of the German taxpayers’ pockets.
During the coalition negotiations it had already become clear that the German 2006 budget will be unconstitutional due to a forty-odd – billion increase of national debt. There was some effort in nomenclature to save at least the pretext of constitutionality, but you can smear lipstick on a swine, it still remains a pig.
From where she is going to get this money is a good guess.
She promised another twenty-five billion €uros as an instant cure to reduce the ten-odd per cent unemployment rate. The expired Schröder administration had launched a series of labor market reforms named “Hartz I - IV”, which turned out to be costly failures, each and every one. The official unemployment figures have decreased by half a million, but that was pure cosmetics. These people did not find new employment, they simply dropped out of the system. Most of them were engaged in a new sort of self-employment, the so-called “Ich AG” (Me inc.), which was a planned and consciously intended failure. Who tries this government-funded way into bankruptcy loses every linkage to our social networks and is doomed to social welfare. The advantage for our federal government is that social welfare is the responsibility of the communities and not our federal government’s.
The tax raises will have two effects: The VAT raise will cut down domestic demand. A good means to help our economy.
The income tax raise will make an income increase less attractive for young and ambitioned, highly educated people. The German political class has been whining and snivelling for quite a while about the increasing emigration rate of well-educated and motivated people, such as MDs, IT professionals, engineers and more. Well, to increase the pressure on this group will definitely help. Last time, a German government had to face such a problem, they built a wall through Berlin and a barbed-wire fence through Germany, separating East from West.
Won’t help this time either, Angie.
The German health care system, despite being admired by a certain expired first lady of the US, had been founded as a failure, but now, after twenty years of forceful “improvement”, it is ready for the slaughterhouse. Angie has promised a few cosmetic repairs, but she and her staff are carefully dodging the core issue: it is a coercive collectivist con game which rewards waste. The health care provider who wastes most money gets his deficit paid by those who work economically. Administration grows like cancer, the patient (and his employer, who has to pay half of the costs) gets less and less service but has to pay more and more for it.
Despite a series of costly TV and newspaper ads, which urge the average comrade, oops, citizen, to fall back in line and work for the commun-, ooops, common good (which remind me of the hold-out slogans of the failing Third Reich), less and less people can afford to do so.
The amount of values created outside of the official economy grows in an increasing rate. Old forms of trade and barter are being reinvented, DIY and e-bay are flourishing. The latest development is the Hamburg based TOLI initiative. TOLI means: Exchange without leftist ideology. To throw away operational things is not only waste, it is a disregarding of the labor that was used to create this value. So to swap item A, which is no longer of use for me, against item B, for which I have use, is a good thing. Even better: as long as no money is involved, it is not subject to taxation. Tough luck, Angie.
Angela “Angie” Merkel is not a true and faithful party soldier who has served the “Ochsentour” (Ox’s journey) through the party organizations, she is a regular professor for Physics. In this property, she should know the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which basically says you can’t get something for nothing.
In order to take money out of anyone’s pocket, there must be money in it. When the taxpayers’ pockets are exhausted, there is but one solution: rev up the printing presses. Inflation exceeding 3% p. a. would violate the Maastricht Treaty of Stability, but who cares? Germany has been doing so ever since that treaty came into effect.
Inflation and debt are mortgages on the future, which our children will have to serve. The decreasing birth rate in Germany is one of the answers to this, and it is pouring oil into Angie’s wildfire. Her lack of ability to solve Germany’s burning problems is showing up. No solutions, just more of the usual cosmetics, administration instead of vision, obedience instead of leadership.
Good night, Abendland!

published on Jan. 03, 2006 at Hier klicken

Lieber ein verfĂĽhrter Verbraucher als ein verbrauchter VerfĂĽhrer...

Bearbeiten/Löschen   ebook  Druckversion

ZurĂĽck zu:  Fremdsprachiges und MundART Ein neues Thema veröffentlichen.     Antwort veröffentlichen.




Werde Fan der Leselupe auf Facebook!